Two weird-ass peas in a pod:   Christianity and statutes of limitation.   Me, I'm not the forgiving kind,  this is blather, but since we're jamming...  Jeffrey Epstein.   What a shitty topic of discussion.   I know everyone is about to puke about the Epstein files, which many people are accused of sandbagging, holy jesus, to protect the guilty.   The two campers, one spiritual (e.g. Jesus), the other secular (adjudication), among the vast shitload of whats and wherefores, exist in the first place to enable everyone good, bad or indifferent to go forward with their shitty, shit eating little lousy lives.   The statute of limitations for some civil rights violations is two years, but there are other stories on that.   Could be five years for burglary or other felonious bullshit.  Depends what you steal.  

I'm gonna' bing forward here in suggesting maybe everyone should forget the Epstein affair, and maybe admit that it could be impossible to prosecute the scumbags Epstein showed a good time.  Resources could be redirected to finding and prosecuting other creeps and perverts.   I think, after a time frame expires, it's a waste to continue chasing larks and herrings while kingfish continue to rule in secrecy.  Everyone is focused on Epstein while ignoring the gestalt of global pervert creeps and assholes of the universe

.    In other words, catch creeps who are doing it now.  Don't waste time and money chasing old crimes.  Go after the big bastards who are active now, and who can be caught and prosecuted.  Epstein' dead, his cronies who may have gotten away with sex crimes, let's hope they shit them selves in terror.  If so, I'm glad.  Logically, is does the rest of humanity no good to remain angry with Jeffrey, Ghislane, Bills Gates and Clinton, Alans Dershowitz and Woody.  This essay is going to shit as I compose it.  Fuck.  

Make like Jesus, and forgive assholes (sinners) much as you might want other nice people to do for you, like cut your poor miserable ass a break.  You probably did shitty things.  But I wouldn't know about that, in specifics.  I don't know what shit you pulled in the past.  Why dwell on ugly sad crapola?   Be blissful.  

A statute of limitation means people can quit looking over their shoulder after they did some chickenshit illegal thing.  Authorities have a specified, finite time frames in which to play Dick Tracy, catch the prick, and throw his/her ass in prison, where assholes fucking belong.  And John Q Public can just as well choose a jig saw puzzle and some drugs.  Don't think about shit that no longer matters.

 Let's think, friends.  Let's think about how the No Kings protest could be all wrong.  What if a monarchy beats holy fuck out of the current American two party fuck up?  It can.  It's less confusing.  People comply with the king, and that includes being civil towards fellow peons like your penniless, slavish self.  Let me explain why you might like it.

There existed a kingdom somewhere near Romania.   It was a cheesy regional kingdom, that's why no one heard of it.    My people hail from that shithole that will someday be thanked for its good sense in disbanding.   It had a good run. Our King Bongfarts was humane, tolerant and open to new ideas.  Everything was great.  Anyone, sane or nuts, smart or a shithead, was allowed to walk right up to King Bongfarts and suggest to him ways to make life better.  Bongfarts listened, and life became so unbearably enjoyable, so insufferably utopian, that no one noticed a certain miserable sad MF.   Out of sheer envy, that jerk hurt King Bongfarts, and soon the region devolved into a democracy.  Now it sucks.  The end.

As long as everyone is in a comparable, equivalent  different-but-similar emotional free fall it's a groovy-ass time to pose a question or two.  About the recent 'No Kings' protest.   How the fuck does everyone know that choosing a king, and complying with the asshole religiously, isn't the most beneficial thing that could happen,  with all the light/years and galaxies above and around farting in hope right now?

The American two party system isn't working too goddam well.    Animosity among common chicken-minded voters, Dem and GOP, has reached such a toxic level that neither party can function its peachiest. 

Dems have had only one strategy since 2016, to oppose Trump and everything he does.  Understandable, but Dems haven't presented alternatives, or built the economy independent of the GOP, which, if there are libertarians out there, is said to be cool about democracies:  people can be productive independent of the president and congress.   In a free market economy.  It is the Dems that demand the federal government provide for them.  

A kingdom might be simpler.   Think how that can stream line an agenda.   Or how it can secure a supply line of food, H20 and common consumer goods that we all eat, shit and wash our clothing and ass in.

Whatever this shit sounds like, I am a progressive libertarian.   What did the No Kings protest do for women?  For feminists.  Nobody said word one about women's reproductive freedoms, some of which were lost to the Supreme Court.  The Roe v Wade reversal.   Did the No Kings protest restore those freedoms? No.  The health care systems sucks assholes.  Did No Kings demand anything, specific, from Trump?  No.  No one said,  "Hey Trump, I demand socialized health care in the European model, not the stupid, criminal chickenshit model the Dems produced way back when, but let's not talk about that.  The No Kings protest did nothing to secure health care for everyone in the US.  Maybe we need to hire a king to get that achieved.

Who gives a flying fuck?  President: asshole.   Politburo:  assholes.  Congress: assholes.   Let's hire a king, and treat the jerk like one.  Just for the fuck of it.  Thanks for reading.