Mental Issues

 Some poor souls have conditions such as OCD or brain chlamydia and can't shut up about politics.  I was doing my best to be one of the silent majority, but I'm not wrapped too tight.  Try to be patient.  Maybe Joseph Stalin was right about dissent being a form of insanity, and that subversives need their brains worked on with an air hammer.  Despised enemy of the people Steve Bannon hatched a 'strategy' that gave the Left fits of temper, and so right they all were to put 'Sloppy Steve' in the hoosegow.   His 'strategy' was a danger to a lot of people.

It was probably, and I'm not all certain of this, a statist agenda that would have reduced the scale of the Federal government, placing many jobs done at federal level into the hands of state government.  Too, it may have been a plan to remove social politics from federal government.   If this plan actually happened, and it didn't, it could have cost a lot of people their jobs and their influence.    Again, no certainty of this on my end, but the hated 'drain the swamp' slogan may have pertained to removing any bias favoring one interest group over others.   I know.  That could mean that your agenda would have lost legitimacy at the federal level.   That didn't happen.   Please drink a gallon of wine and continue reading.  

Senile old people like myself might have a lucid moment and recall the wave of corporate downsizing that took place throughout the 1980s and 90s.  This was taking place in the private sector of the economy.   Younger and less senile folks might be aware of a wild uptick in non-profit corporations that began after the downsizing in the private sector.   This was a shift from tax paying private business to tax exempt business, allowing corporate executives to get rich or richer at public expense.   501C3 businesses are supposedly humanitarian or charitable, so it became necessary to adopt the pretext of social justice.   Most of the money involved goes to the rich, but with deep concern for the poor and oppressed.   Sloppy Steve's strategy was probably a danger to this trend in business.  

Nothing to worry about.  Steve is history.   The gravy trains are all running on schedule.  No one gives a rat's hairy butt what I think or do.   I'm senile.  

Done with it

 As subject matter goes, politics is for people who are too agitated to watch reruns of I Love Lucy.  You can talk for hours about that television show, and not get crank phone calls, harassment, weird head games and whatever else people are doing to silence their perceived opposition.   Maybe I'm wrong.  There may be militant Fred Mertz haters.   Maybe someone was harmed by his wife, Ethel.   Maybe Ricky Ricardo misappropriated a pair of castanets from the formerly beautiful Carlotta Romero.   Little Ricky might have peed on someone's priceless maracas.  What if Lucy sat on Fidel Castro's face?   Those are all good reasons to harass people who talk about that ancient, formerly popular television show.   It's still safer than talking about presidential politics.  

I'm done trying to reason with people about world affairs, or about keeping the peace in the United States.  There appear to be Party approved activists, mostly Hollywood A-list folks who weren't exposed as sex offenders.   They're famous, I'm not, so they're right about whatever hash they're slinging.  I'm now a full time television viewer, with no opinions and no pretense to any agenda of any kind.   And I'm a happy MF.

If you are still talking about any US president, doesn't matter which one, please get a lobotomy or try using heroin.   I'm done with the subject of politics.

Crank Phone Calls From Jerks

 

Oh, heck.   Last month I sent a letter to the editor and after it posted to the online newspaper I started getting crank phone calls.   Some have been hang up calls, other one's were cryptic BS from someone sounding female, and the best one yet began was a digital robo-call saying that the price of electricity would be going up and that I was being offered a forty percent discount, "press 'one' to speak with a representative."   I pressed 'one,' and a real person, probably female, came on the line and  mumbled something or other.  I asked, "Are you offering me a forty percent discount?"    "No," she said, "F___ you, you piece of  s___"   I said thanks and hung up.

The letter was about the problem in social politics.   People have become immune to reason, and insanely aggressive.   Too, free and open analysis of presidential politics has become a ghost.  Certain people have been 'cancelling' anything running contrary to their singular point of view.   I wrote the letter out of frustration with what has become a barrier to free speech and expression.   It was stupid to bother trying to pitch the concept of centrism, and stupider to use '45' and what happened 2015 through now to illustrate that people may be combatting the best courses of action out of partisanship.   People used to like debating politics.  Now they take whatever position their comrades are taking, whomever their comrades are.   I wonder who or what is calling the shots.   Millions of people can't all be getting the exact same information and directives from thin air.

Crank phone calls are a pain in the butt, so I stopped answering the phone when it rings, and let the answering machine take it from there.   Not that I'm going to do it, since normal decent people might be calling for a real reason, I've been thinking up humorous messages to leave on the machine, in case crank callers have a sense of humor.  They usually don't.  Some of them think they do, but they are delusional.  

"This is Bruce's dog," one might begin.  "Bruce is a caring wonderful person, and he's been getting crank phone calls from heartless, sick, animal abusers.   If you are one of these pigs, I'll have you know Bruce suffered an aneurism because of what you've been doing, you idiot, and he is unable to get to the store and buy me food, so I'm starving, and it's your fault, you scumbag.  Please leave a message at the beep."

Consider Political Centrism

 

Political centrism isn't a popular position.  The point in it, though, is to keep the peace and to better enable grass roots politics among persons on both the Left and Right.   Suppose Democrats and Republicans seek common ground.   There are things both parties can agree on and support.   Differences can be managed.  

The epidemic of violence should be one thing individuals in both parties can work together on.   Pro 2nd doesn't mean 'pro-violence.'   Some people feel they need to be able to protect themselves. Other people believe the 2nd amendment is out-moded and shouldn't remain in effect.   The disagreement is understandable, and there is merit on both sides.   But this does not mean both parties can't work together.  People need to teach their kids respect for human life, 2nd amendment or no.   Leadership has not done everything it can to inspire young people.    And to discourage rash acts of violence, of any kind, anywhere, for any reason.   There are many reasons to consider political centrism.

The recent reversal of Roe V Wade is a conflict that may be impossible to resolve.  I'm pro-choice and believe reproductive freedom is between an individual and a service provider.  The government should never have taken a position on it, for or against.   The pro-life element has the right to speak against abortion, while pro-choice individuals should be free to do as they wish.   It's only a suggestion, but feminists might re-consider the concept of free market economics.   It's probably out of the box, but the right to abortion could be supported on the basis of free enterprise.   Also on the basis of right to privacy.  Suppose Democrats and Republicans agree that the Federal government has become overly intrusive and authoritarian.  Also consider that reproductive rights may have to be protected at state level.  The much hated '45' had an agenda to shift power from the Fed to the state government.   The reversal against reproductive freedom is reason to shift to statist politics.  No matter how people hate you-know-who. 

For the record, I vote Dem.   It was a waste of time trying to mediate between Left and Right during 45's presidency.  All it did was piss people off.  Now that the president is a Dem, it's my opinion both parties should kiss and make up.   Accept differing opinions, speak freely, live in mutual respect.  Coalesce to change the wrongs both sides agree are wrong.   I've been a sad little munchkin because I want to work for the cause of peace, and nobody likes my methods.   Sorry for being a freak. 

No One Is Protesting Unfair Business Practices

 Seven can be an asinine number.  Especially among people who are superstitious.  It's supposed, by some folks, to be lucky.   But the last seven years have been quite, quite dreadful.   The pandemic is set into the time frame like an ugly, radioactive  diamond.    The US Presidency of one particularly hated media personality caused the worst division among people in US history, short of the Civil War.  Social media became a corporate tool of government, first giving, then taking free speech and free enterprise along with it.  People have been de-platformed and de-monitised  for saying things the Powers don't want peons sharing.   

We The People are being oppressed by inflation.   The Federal Reserve keeps raising interest rates, which profits the banking industry, while claiming it will reverse inflation.  How ridiculous.  It will sustain inflation, while having no positive effect on the lives of  the middle class and poor.   It will increase the power of the very rich, of course.   The Federal Reserve should have been abolished a long time ago, and the banks should have been forced to reduce extortionate interest on loans and credit cards, and to pay appropriate interest to their customer's for their savings account.  People used to get 4%  interest on passbook savings, now they get nearly nothing, and are subject to  oppressive penalties.   The whole time the most universally hated person was US Prez, no one was taking action against the banking industry.  No one was protecting free speech and free enterprise from unfair repression.  Bummer, man.  

Please demand reform in the banking industry.

fiction: Outsider

 

In most of rural Pennsylvania shooting a person in the leg is considered a prank. Even the police raise a chuckle. "Did you see

 the look on Mike's face? He don't need no crutches. Them's for people who have a job."

It's considered lucky to have a job waxing floors at the court house. If you need two good legs to run a buffer it's proof of congenital character problems. There's only a few cities in the so called 'Keystone State,' and people think differently in those hornet nests of sin. Shoot someone with so much as a paint ball gun and they go to pieces over it.

It's a total waste of time explaining to people in Pittsburgh that pain is a ten percent discount on your ticket to Heaven. That aside, it's a town full of non-violent criminals. They screw people over all the time, lie, cheat and steal all the time, and they are all best of friends. And they don't want anyone owning guns, because it escapes their wispy conscience that they have been inflicting harm. They love their own, and have to keep strangers from getting a foothold on their eroding turf. As if they were the illegitimate babies of Mr. Spock from Star Trek, they are entitled to live well and prosper. Not one lying, corrupt jet of gaslight deserves to face the consequence of their vile behavior. My right leg aches when I think about it.

Eeegads... I've offended a person or scanning device.

 Just got some  emails, all saying Blogger put up a shield on several posts, all from about four years ago.  Hardly anyone reads this blog.  How did they determine this?    What am I, the G. G. Allin of prose? 

Like a sweetheart, I looked up the posts, and reverted them to drafts so no one has to suffer through reading my creative work.