Friends, I ain't close to being tough, damnit I'm sensitive, horse-whispering, diminutive. I just want to boast of sufficient fortitude to have never, in all my fragile days, called the police because a broad exposed herself. And in my time, broads have flashed tits, ass and beaver, in bars, at sporting events, in undisclosed common-enough locations of all sort. I never sued a woman for ramming a tit in my face. Recall the chicanery that went on in old haunts like Studio 54. People are behaving as if people aren't depraved horn dogs, when common alertness begs an off-track opinion.
Flashing, along with nudging and groping, probably existed from the dawning of glad rags and the libido. It's a popular mating procedure performed by rock and roll groupies world wide. Prison inmates of all genders expose themselves to guards and love prospects of equally diverse typings and groupings. These behaviors are made mention of in the news, in film, literature, legend. Most currently there is a national backlash against sexual impropriety of all sorts, and holy jeepers, a ghost ship, analagous to the more famous Flying Dutchman, the ghost of the Sexual Revolution, looms in vision like an eye-ball floater. In this case the transparent viscous mass is shaped like a a giant cock and balls.
For the media to have become the sex deviant haven it is, a flocking process took place. Perverts who enjoy making films, e.g. Roman Polanski, were drawn to the West Coast media establishment. The sexual revolution was a popular trend of the 1960s and 70's, and it coordinted divinely with a number of common enough factoids, e.g. sex sells, it draws viewerships, and most wonderful of all, people from here to Timbuctoo discovered sensuality, en mass. Taboos were wiped off the slate. Once there was an easy cure for syphillis and gonorhea, there was no reason not to screw one's self into indelible and ever renewable euphoria. And it was during the same frame that people took measures to liberate the body. People started getting naked. It's one of the beefs against Charlie "Mr. Happy" Rose. He seemed to think it was acceptable to expose himself. How times change. And mice get caught in the disposable adhesive trap. Allegations of sexual misconduct are a sticky political aparatus. Always were.
But something new has been added. Smearing a politician by any means possible is old hat, but currently any media figure at all known to be nasty is open to controlled career demolition, and in this round of the Social Olympics, it appears women may be trying to open jobs for women by getting men fired. Could be mass cashing in on law suits. My sermon on the crap here will gently critique the 'Me Too' campaign, no big deal, but it sounds childish, might instigate false allegations, frivolous litigation, may be extortionate, as well as may yield safer and healthier work places.
The 'Me Too' campaign could be criticised as being a case of mass infantilization and soft core extortion. There have been ethics problems in the past with intensive reform movements. Compare it to the slip and fall business. It tends to streamline litigation while hiking the cost of doing business across the board. Companies have to eat the cost of being sued and interceded upon. Reminder: this isn't the first time status as victims was established and recompense was obtained.
Let's talk about the weenie wagging of one former news man, Charlie Rose. Some feebrile, quavering apologists could opine that professional assistants and support staff, in many locations, e.g. hospitals, spas, massage parlors, may wind up viewing tits, ass, cocks'n balls, snatch and all related appurtenances. It could be further opined that Mr. Rose's support staff ought to be able to deal with some nasty. I don't recall the media establishment ever being a moral wonderland in any capacity. If getting naked falls under 'community standards,' it could follow that the hired help will be viewing some dicks.
Sex crimes can be prosecuted, civil offenses can be litigated, and everyone in the respectively prim and horny US is at liberty to communicate complaints and concerns, using the internet, from hither to Planet Uranas. Add that the 'Me Too' campaign could be a lynch mob mentality in popular format, it's probably wise to keep the trousers up, the mitts in one's pockets, and watch one's frigging mouth. Seems people are being put on alert. Point isn't that one side or other is right or wrong, it's another disgusting popular trend with possible shit consequences. House policy is to encourage positive social relations across the board. I'm just too faint of heart to get in the middle of a gender conflict. People should be resolving conflict, not generating it.
Flashing, along with nudging and groping, probably existed from the dawning of glad rags and the libido. It's a popular mating procedure performed by rock and roll groupies world wide. Prison inmates of all genders expose themselves to guards and love prospects of equally diverse typings and groupings. These behaviors are made mention of in the news, in film, literature, legend. Most currently there is a national backlash against sexual impropriety of all sorts, and holy jeepers, a ghost ship, analagous to the more famous Flying Dutchman, the ghost of the Sexual Revolution, looms in vision like an eye-ball floater. In this case the transparent viscous mass is shaped like a a giant cock and balls.
For the media to have become the sex deviant haven it is, a flocking process took place. Perverts who enjoy making films, e.g. Roman Polanski, were drawn to the West Coast media establishment. The sexual revolution was a popular trend of the 1960s and 70's, and it coordinted divinely with a number of common enough factoids, e.g. sex sells, it draws viewerships, and most wonderful of all, people from here to Timbuctoo discovered sensuality, en mass. Taboos were wiped off the slate. Once there was an easy cure for syphillis and gonorhea, there was no reason not to screw one's self into indelible and ever renewable euphoria. And it was during the same frame that people took measures to liberate the body. People started getting naked. It's one of the beefs against Charlie "Mr. Happy" Rose. He seemed to think it was acceptable to expose himself. How times change. And mice get caught in the disposable adhesive trap. Allegations of sexual misconduct are a sticky political aparatus. Always were.
But something new has been added. Smearing a politician by any means possible is old hat, but currently any media figure at all known to be nasty is open to controlled career demolition, and in this round of the Social Olympics, it appears women may be trying to open jobs for women by getting men fired. Could be mass cashing in on law suits. My sermon on the crap here will gently critique the 'Me Too' campaign, no big deal, but it sounds childish, might instigate false allegations, frivolous litigation, may be extortionate, as well as may yield safer and healthier work places.
The 'Me Too' campaign could be criticised as being a case of mass infantilization and soft core extortion. There have been ethics problems in the past with intensive reform movements. Compare it to the slip and fall business. It tends to streamline litigation while hiking the cost of doing business across the board. Companies have to eat the cost of being sued and interceded upon. Reminder: this isn't the first time status as victims was established and recompense was obtained.
Let's talk about the weenie wagging of one former news man, Charlie Rose. Some feebrile, quavering apologists could opine that professional assistants and support staff, in many locations, e.g. hospitals, spas, massage parlors, may wind up viewing tits, ass, cocks'n balls, snatch and all related appurtenances. It could be further opined that Mr. Rose's support staff ought to be able to deal with some nasty. I don't recall the media establishment ever being a moral wonderland in any capacity. If getting naked falls under 'community standards,' it could follow that the hired help will be viewing some dicks.
Sex crimes can be prosecuted, civil offenses can be litigated, and everyone in the respectively prim and horny US is at liberty to communicate complaints and concerns, using the internet, from hither to Planet Uranas. Add that the 'Me Too' campaign could be a lynch mob mentality in popular format, it's probably wise to keep the trousers up, the mitts in one's pockets, and watch one's frigging mouth. Seems people are being put on alert. Point isn't that one side or other is right or wrong, it's another disgusting popular trend with possible shit consequences. House policy is to encourage positive social relations across the board. I'm just too faint of heart to get in the middle of a gender conflict. People should be resolving conflict, not generating it.
No comments:
Post a Comment