It's hard to be pompous. Deep breath. Turning red. I'm being a prig about confidentiality. I read a news article supposedly exposing 45 as a raving, unfit horrible hephalump from Poo Forest. An alternative perception of the Rosenstein circle jerk is that it's a deceptive and unethical breach of confidentiality. The shit said about the 25th amendment may have been a joke or hyperbole. Maybe they were both blowing smoke.
The article described nutty behavior on the part of 45. This rounder opines that loose talk spoken with the expectation of confidentiality cannot be regarded as a basis for action against a mop jockey. The Prez likes to to bullshit.
The garbage about wanting to fire Comey before he was elected was angry talk, but probably not a genuine position on that matter. Things people say behind closed doors are usually not identical to that which one goes public with, unless one is very fucking Amish-like. It's fun to cuss out people who piss you off. What's wrong with a little happy horseshit?
The crap about Rosenstein having considered recording conversations is a clam out of season, to say the least, if he actually did discuss it. Mitigation, dear readers. Talking about it in private isn't too fucking far off the grid. Even shit behavior may be logical. All kinds of pricks record conversations illegally, all over creation. Lawyers are peckerheads. People fib. One may wish to prove someone fibbed for a spectrum of reasons. If the jerks were upset over something, and people get J.O.ed all the time, one or both might have mouthed off like a punk, but it wasn't intended to be publicized. That goes for both 45 and Rosenstein. Look at the shit Nixon got caught saying on tape. Where has everyone been?
A description of Rosenstein's supposed state of emotional distress in the article gave me some agita. People get jizzed. Maybe he's a nervous type. Barney Fife. He looks sorta' like him, no? Anyway, I don't want to cloud up your morning with too much of my bullshit. I just like to hulk out an alternative point of view. Why the fuck not?
The article described nutty behavior on the part of 45. This rounder opines that loose talk spoken with the expectation of confidentiality cannot be regarded as a basis for action against a mop jockey. The Prez likes to to bullshit.
The garbage about wanting to fire Comey before he was elected was angry talk, but probably not a genuine position on that matter. Things people say behind closed doors are usually not identical to that which one goes public with, unless one is very fucking Amish-like. It's fun to cuss out people who piss you off. What's wrong with a little happy horseshit?
The crap about Rosenstein having considered recording conversations is a clam out of season, to say the least, if he actually did discuss it. Mitigation, dear readers. Talking about it in private isn't too fucking far off the grid. Even shit behavior may be logical. All kinds of pricks record conversations illegally, all over creation. Lawyers are peckerheads. People fib. One may wish to prove someone fibbed for a spectrum of reasons. If the jerks were upset over something, and people get J.O.ed all the time, one or both might have mouthed off like a punk, but it wasn't intended to be publicized. That goes for both 45 and Rosenstein. Look at the shit Nixon got caught saying on tape. Where has everyone been?
A description of Rosenstein's supposed state of emotional distress in the article gave me some agita. People get jizzed. Maybe he's a nervous type. Barney Fife. He looks sorta' like him, no? Anyway, I don't want to cloud up your morning with too much of my bullshit. I just like to hulk out an alternative point of view. Why the fuck not?
No comments:
Post a Comment