I feel like a oogy ogre for scaring up a few paltry counterpoints to the Kavenaugh fracas. It's possible that a history of sexual assault has nothing to do with his ability to serve on the Supreme Court. The Constitution doesn't have tits to squeeze. The way it may apply in a court case has nada, zito and diddly to do with a possible juvenile offence of any kind. All right, Rowe Vs. Wade is a big red flag to my counterpoint, and I support all feminist positions with regard to reproductive freedom. That aside, and if he did grope her, it still doesn't prove he can't render fair verdicts.
Shitsky, I'll have to back-slide again. Anything pertaining to the disposition of sex crimes could be compromised if the judges have more skeletons than Ted Bundy. But Peckerhead Kavenaugh hasn't been convicted of anything, statutes of limitation zipped off, and here's maybe something, okay, cheesy, maybe relevant: The victim is a psychologist professor, Ph.d. Problemo.
If the assault even took place, the perp was a juvenile. I'm not citing law, but it could be an ethics issue that a mental health professional would go public with a juvenile offence. Those cases tend to be handled with much greater confidentiality than those of adults. The university to which she is attached could incur damage if she turns out to be a lying sack, and if it's opined her conduct is poor professional conduct for a Ph.d level shrink. I hate myself for bringing this up, but wouldn't a psychologist be able recover from trauma by now, if the therapy works as good as hoped for one and all, patients at large and her? I haven't heard one public personality mention the issue of public confidence in head shrinkers. She could be making them look like assholes.
Another thing. My personal experience with those professionals is that they are quite, quite capable of lying, acting unethically in partisanship, and of course, of being a dirty snitch who is being paid to lie. Universities and the medical establishment, alike, are a vast weasel city. Look what a cunt Big Pharma is.
That's all the shit that's fit to opine. Don't let me give you a headache. I'm just a circumspect little munchkin. Try to be broad minded.
Shitsky, I'll have to back-slide again. Anything pertaining to the disposition of sex crimes could be compromised if the judges have more skeletons than Ted Bundy. But Peckerhead Kavenaugh hasn't been convicted of anything, statutes of limitation zipped off, and here's maybe something, okay, cheesy, maybe relevant: The victim is a psychologist professor, Ph.d. Problemo.
If the assault even took place, the perp was a juvenile. I'm not citing law, but it could be an ethics issue that a mental health professional would go public with a juvenile offence. Those cases tend to be handled with much greater confidentiality than those of adults. The university to which she is attached could incur damage if she turns out to be a lying sack, and if it's opined her conduct is poor professional conduct for a Ph.d level shrink. I hate myself for bringing this up, but wouldn't a psychologist be able recover from trauma by now, if the therapy works as good as hoped for one and all, patients at large and her? I haven't heard one public personality mention the issue of public confidence in head shrinkers. She could be making them look like assholes.
Another thing. My personal experience with those professionals is that they are quite, quite capable of lying, acting unethically in partisanship, and of course, of being a dirty snitch who is being paid to lie. Universities and the medical establishment, alike, are a vast weasel city. Look what a cunt Big Pharma is.
That's all the shit that's fit to opine. Don't let me give you a headache. I'm just a circumspect little munchkin. Try to be broad minded.
No comments:
Post a Comment